Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour

More from deviantART


Submitted on
February 29, 2012


3 (who?)
So I was reading this latest article from AVfM. Seemed like pretty good stuff even though I fealt I was already familuar with most of it. Then I got near the bottom.

"The United States Supreme Court recently took this absurd situation to a new level of hypocrisy. On February 23 2012, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment upholding the constitutionality of a law that allows teenage boys – but not teenage girls – to be prosecuted for having underage sex."

So basically, if a 17 year old girl rapes a 13 year old boy on his birthday, then the law says that the rape victim must be charged with rape. And of course this same law will probably be used to give teenage female rapists an even freer pass than they already enjoy by merit of being the preferred sex. How much longer until 7 year old boys can be charged with rape for having been raped by older women?

I just... I'm a little sick right now, on multiple levels.
Add a Comment:
Okay i now know your making this up this is too stupid
lordmep Sep 22, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
This question comes up a lot when dealing with the enemies of Mens Rights. Are they stupid or evil? I hate to say it, but I'm pretty sure they don't let stupid people into the Supreme Court.
Once you turn 18, get a CCW permit. Then you can shoot your rapist :D
eris-chaos-goddess Feb 29, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I'm sick, too. I'd be going to prison for murdering the little bitch who touches my son.

We have to protect our sons from our daughters, Our husbands from our wives, our male students from our female teachers. There is a rise in predatory psycho bitches, and a drop in safety for our men and boys.

Justice is truly dead.
Add a Comment: